I think maybe instead of having to upgrade to like four stars or watever by buying it we could have someone like the creator of the site give us a rating judged on colour and facilitys you know???
I personally prefer having control over the upgrading of my hotel myself, especially considering the extra costs of building new floors/rooms with more stars.
It would be neat though if admin offered extra acknowledgment such as 'Top Hotel this Week' or something similar.
i just don't like how it doesn't do anything to how much you have to pay for it.
it doesn't make sense.
all you do is just pay money see some stars and it costs more money to build floors.
Yea..i agre with jellyroll. i mean, what does it do to actually improving your hotel?? The only thing you can do is build betta rooms...but what difference does it truly make, and why spend that much money getting one more *
Say, you have 10 guests every day. So, they fill 10 best rooms of all you have. Say, you have one hotel with 10 rooms. Now:
* if all your rooms are Eco rooms, you get 500€; since room upkeep is then 100€ and total upkeep is 140€ (yes, the total upkeep for a 1* hotel is so low), you earn netto 510€ daily from your ten guests (you remember you have shops, yeah? :)),
* if all your rooms are royal suites, you get 7600€; since room upkeep is then 920€ and total upkeep is 2080€ (about, I don't remember the exact cost), you earn netto 4850€ daily from your ten guests.
So, it seems it is good to have only royal suites. But imagine that one day noone comes to your hotel. Then
* if all your rooms are Eco rooms, you earn 10€ daily!
* if all your rooms are royal suites, you loose 2750€!
Greetings!
Jan 12th 2009, 07:29